Salta al contenuto principale
Passa alla visualizzazione normale.

SABRINA AUCI

Smart Cities and Eu growth strategy: a Comparison among European Cities

  • Autori: Auci S.; Mundula L.
  • Anno di pubblicazione: 2015
  • Tipologia: Altro
  • Parole Chiave: smart cities, stochastic frontier, technical inefficiency
  • OA Link: http://hdl.handle.net/10447/337934

Abstract

The level of interest in smart cities has been growing during these last years. The academic literature (Holland, 2008; Caragliu et al., 2009, Nijkamp et al., 2011 and Lombardi et al., 2012) has identified a number of factors that characterise a city as smart, such as economic development, business-friendly, environmental sustainability, social innovation, information and knowledge process, and human and social capital. Thus, the smartness concept is strictly linked to urban efficiency in a multifaceted way as well as to citizens’ wellbeing through the use of appropriate technologies. Instead, from a “political perspective” smartness is mainly related to the ability of using ICT (Information and Communication Technology) as instrument to strengthen economic growth. In this perspective, a research by Giffinger et al. (2007) to support European policy has defined the concept of smart city on the basis of several intangible indicators (such as a smart economy, smart mobility, smart environment, smart people, smart living, and smart governance) and has become a benchmark for European policy makers (European Parliament’s Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, 2014). Following this influential research, the aim of our paper is to verify how much these smartness indicators can influence the efficiency and indirectly the growth of the same sample of European cities. Using the concept of output maximising, we built a stochastic frontier function in terms of urban productivity and/or urban efficiency by assessing the economic distance that separates cities from that frontier. Moreover, this approach, which distinguishes between inputs and efficiency, allows us to incorporate the smartness indicators into the systematic component within the error term. As a result, our conclusions identify a different ranking of European cities with respect to Giffinger et al. (2007) analysis, thereby highlighting the need for a better and more robust definition of these indicators.