Salta al contenuto principale
Passa alla visualizzazione normale.

SERGIO SIRAGUSA

Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

  • Autori: Büller, HR; Décousus, H; Grosso, MA; Mercuri, M; Middeldorp, S; Prins, MH; Raskob, GE; Schellong, SM; Schwocho, L; Segers, A; Siragusa, S; Shi, M; Verhamme, P; Wells, P
  • Anno di pubblicazione: 2013
  • Tipologia: Articolo in rivista (Articolo in rivista)
  • Parole Chiave: Anticoagulants, Edoxaban
  • OA Link: http://hdl.handle.net/10447/96630

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban can be an alternative to warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism is unclear. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study, we randomly assigned patients with acute venous thromboembolism, who had initially received heparin, to receive edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily, or 30 mg once daily (e.g., in the case of patients with creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 ml per minute or a body weight below 60 kg), or to receive warfarin. Patients received the study drug for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 4921 patients presented with deep-vein thrombosis, and 3319 with a pulmonary embolism. Among patients receiving warfarin, the time in the therapeutic range was 63.5%. Edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the primary efficacy outcome, w...