Nozick, Rawls e il Welfare dei diritti fondamentali

Abstract

In this article, I will analyze Nozick's theory of justice, particularly his basic arguments, that of fair distribution in favor of Wilt Chamberlain, that of forced labor, that Kantian, to show the difficulties of such a libertarian conception, which I consider unacceptable. Next, I will show, on the basis of six arguments why a liberal-egalitarian conception is preferable, a welfare of fundamental rights, liberty and social rights, as provided in many Western constitutions. Finally, I will conclude by saying how some forms of unequal distribution of wealth can be justified, based on four arguments