Salta al contenuto principale
Passa alla visualizzazione normale.

VINCENZA CALVARUSO

Quality Measures to Enhance the Management and Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Delphi Consensus Study

  • Autori: Alvaro, D.; Calvaruso, V.; Carbone, M.; Cazzagon, N.; Floreani, A.; Invernizzi, P.; Marzioni, M.; Pasqualetti, P.; Pennisi, G.; Toniutto, P.; Vespasiani-Gentilucci, U.; Craxì, A.
  • Anno di pubblicazione: 2025
  • Tipologia: Articolo in rivista
  • OA Link: http://hdl.handle.net/10447/692491

Abstract

Background & AimsPrimary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease characterised by bile duct destruction, leading to cholestasis and fibrosis. Despite therapeutic advancements, gaps remain in diagnostic standardisation, treatment response evaluation, and patient-centred care. This study aimed to develop consensus-driven quality measures to optimise PBC management.MethodsUsing the Delphi methodology, 92 clinicians participated in two rounds of surveys addressing diagnostic protocols, therapeutic strategies, follow-up standards, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Appropriateness ratings were analysed using the RAND/UCLA method to achieve consensus on key quality measures.ResultsStrong consensus was reached on the appropriateness of non-invasive diagnostic tools such as Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE) and abdominal ultrasound for staging and monitoring fibrosis in chronic cholestasis. Different treatment options were evaluated in patients with inadequate response to UDCA, including compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A), with early initiation deemed appropriate in cases of UDCA intolerance or partial response. Genetic studies and liver biopsy showed variability in consensus, particularly for patients without biochemical cholestasis, reflecting areas needing further research.ConclusionsThis study establishes actionable quality measures for PBC care, offering specific recommendations on diagnostic protocols, therapeutic benchmarks, and follow-up standards. These measures go beyond guidelines by addressing gaps in patient stratification, follow-up protocols, and strategies. Future research should address cost-effectiveness, access to non-invasive tools, and implementation challenges such as clinician training and resource availability.