Skip to main content
Passa alla visualizzazione normale.

ATTILIO SULLI

Improving the Accuracy of Optical Satellite-Derived Bathymetry Through High Spatial, Spectral, and Temporal Resolutions

Abstract

Accurate nearshore bathymetry is essential for various marine applications, including navigation, resource management, and the protection of coastal ecosystems and the services they provide. This study presents an approach to enhance the accuracy of bathymetric estimates derived from high-spatial- and high-temporal-resolution optical satellite imagery. The proposed technique is particularly suited for multispectral sensors that acquire spectral bands sequentially rather than simultaneously. PlanetScope SuperDove imagery was employed and validated against bathymetric data collected using a multibeam echosounder. The study area is the Gulf of Sciacca, located along the southwestern coast of Sicily in the Mediterranean Sea. Here, multibeam data were acquired along transects that are subparallel to the shoreline, covering depths ranging from approximately 7 m to 50 m. Satellite imagery was radiometrically and atmospherically corrected and then processed using a simplified radiative transfer transformation to generate a continuous bathymetric map extending over the entire gulf. The resulting satellite-derived bathymetry achieved reliable accuracy between approximately 5 m and 25 m depth. Beyond these limits, excessive signal attenuation for higher depths and increased water turbidity close to shore introduced significant uncertainties. The innovative aspect of this approach lies in the combined use of spectral averaging among the most water-penetrating bands, temporal averaging across multiple acquisitions, and a liquid-facets noise reduction technique. The integration of these multi-layer inputs led to improved accuracy compared to using single-date or single-band imagery alone. Results show a strong correlation between the satellite-derived bathymetry and multibeam measurements over sandy substrates, with an estimated error of ±6% at a 95% confidence interval. Some discrepancies, however, were observed in the presence of mixed pixels (e.g., submerged vegetation or rocky substrates) or surface artifacts.