Skip to main content
Passa alla visualizzazione normale.

MASSIMO MIDIRI

PI-RADS 3 Lesions: Role of Prostate MRI Texture Analysis in the Identification of Prostate Cancer

  • Authors: Giambelluca D.; Cannella R.; Vernuccio F.; Comelli A.; Pavone A.; Salvaggio L.; Galia M.; Midiri M.; Lagalla R.; Salvaggio G.
  • Publication year: 2021
  • Type: Articolo in rivista
  • OA Link: http://hdl.handle.net/10447/589716

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the diagnostic performance of texture analysis of prostate MRI for the diagnosis of prostate cancer among Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 lesions. Materials and Methods: Forty-three patients with at least 1 PI-RADS 3 lesion on prostate MRI performed between June 2016 and January 2019 were retrospectively included. Reference standard was pathological analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens or MRI-targeted biopsies. Texture analysis extraction of target lesions was performed on axial T2-weighted images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps using a radiomic software. Lesions were categorized as prostate cancer (Gleason score [GS] ≥ 6), and no prostate cancer. Statistical analysis was performed using the generalized linear model (GLM) regression and the discriminant analysis (DA). AUROC with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess the diagnostic performance of standalone features and predictive models for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (GS ≥ 6) and clinically-significant prostate cancer (GS ≥ 7). Results: The analysis of 46 PI-RADS 3 lesions (ie, 27 [58.7%] no prostate cancers; 19 [41.3%] prostate cancers) revealed 9 and 6 independent texture parameters significantly correlated with the final histopathological results on T2-weighted and ADC maps images, respectively. The resulting GLM and DA predictive models for the diagnosis of prostate cancer yielded an AUROC of 0.775 and 0.779 on T2-weighted images or 0.815 and 0.821 on ADC maps images. For the diagnosis of clinically-significant prostate cancer, the resulting GLM and DA predictive models for the diagnosis of prostate cancer yielded an AUROC of 0.769 and 0.817 on T2-weighted images or 0.749 and 0.744 on ADC maps images. Conclusion: Texture analysis of PI-RADS 3 lesions on T2-weighted and ADC maps images helps identifying prostate cancer. The good diagnostic performance of the combination of multiple radiomic features for the diagnosis of prostate cancer may help predicting lesions where aggressive management may be warranted.